2025-01-23
I got tagged in a challenge by my friend, Joel!
That's a good question. I started blogging in 2006/2007, on a website called GeekStinkBreath.net. It was a Green Day fansite that had a members only blogging area. I did it just for fun, I guess? I was a bored sheltered 11 year-old with unfettered access to the Internet, and my fellow Green Day fan friends were doing it too, so of course I started blogging. I didn't "actually" start blogging on a proper platform until a few years later. I got my first domain in high school and have been doing it ever since. I think I like the idea of having a place to let out my thoughts and talking to people on the Internet about them.
I use Grav, which is a CMS. When it comes to doing anything, I need the least friction possible. With Grav, I can access it easily on my phone, tablet, or laptop. I also feel like I'm actually writing. If I were to write in my terminal or a note editor or something, it feels too much like coding. I think I'm easily affected by my environment. I have to be in the right mindset, and where I do my writing influences it a lot. This is something I've learned since using static site generators like Hugo and Jekyll.
Yes. Yep. Sure have. I'll list them out in chronological order as best as I can.
Because Grav is a CMS, it's as easy as just logging in, creating a new post, writing it, and hitting publish. Most of the time, I just write it all in one go. A really boring setup but just thinking about adding more complexity is a sure fire way for me to not want to blog.
I'm someone who needs something to respond to. If I'm not moved to say something, it's hard for me to say anything at all. I don't like talking for the sake of talking (or in this case, writing for the sake of writing).
Post immediately. Well, after a read through or two. Usually I catch any typos after it's been published, despite the proofreading.
It's a toss up between Sweet Tooth and "I'm in love with this all" (Thoughts about To the Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf) . "Sweet Tooth" is, honestly, kind of a pathetic post for me to have written. At the same time, it is so genuine that I had to write it. And because it really came from the heart, I'm fond of it. I like how it was written, too, kind of prose-like. Now I want to go back and eat that same cake.
The other post, "I'm in love with this all" is about my favourite Virginia Woolf novel. I don't think I did a proper tribute to it in the post, but re-reading it now, I'm still in agreement with everything I wrote. She wrote the perfect book, and I really hold it to a high standard. I love how she moves from character to character, how she can capture the nuances of human behaviour, how she asks the big questions that we either avoid or pour over incessantly. A great book. Not a great post, but I like it nevertheless.
I keep meaning to redesign the website, but I know that if I start on it, I will be utterly consumed by it, neglecting work and studies to do so. I think I'll (again) wait for the semester to be over before I attempt it. Other than that, I guess the plan is just to keep on writing?
I explicitly tag melo and Jam, if they are so inclined to do so (no pressure though).
And if you're reading this and want to do it, too, consider yourself "tagged!" Tell them isa sent you.
2025-01-22
I am continuing with trying to listen to more albums. The nice thing about having moved to a downloaded library is that I can finally listen to a lot of Joanna Newsom. I listened through her entire discography twice. It's amazing, front to back.
Ethel Cain's Perverts is still on my to-listen list because I want to really sit down and pay attention to it. I only really listened to the first two tracks, and it's amazing. It's like drone rock? Drone is really hit or miss for me, and I prefer my drone with a little sludge metal, but I like this a lot so far.
New Lucy Dacus!!! I'm so hyped for her new release. The songs released are so beautiful, as expected.
Top albums from last week:
2025-01-19
In 2024, I kept track of my reading in my Hobonichi A5 HON (overview of how is linked here). For most of the year, I did great with tracking, however there was a dip in the middle of year, both in reading and in accurate tracking. It was fun trying to compile of these stats, flipping back and forth and reading my entries!
This year I'm just aiming to read 100 books. I'm only a week into my school semester and I barely have enough time to read more than ten pages a day. I usually read during my commute to and from work, but now I'm doing homework or reading assigned texts during my train rides. However, I still want to try to read as much as I can! I'm trying to figure out when it's possible.
Some books I plan on reading:
On average, it took me 1.48 days to read a book.
Breaking it down into a different kind of format category:
On a per month basis (average of ~20 books per month):
I decided to re-read The Secret History by Donna Tartt while I was on a plane to Toronto. It's one of my favourite books, and it still held up on a second read. It's actually so funny. I love it so much that I'm already reading it again for a third time.
A touching memoir that I read in ebook form. I put it on my wishlist to physically own. It's that good. Very raw and honest. Hewitt is a very good writer.
I'm a big Woolf fan. This book, to me, is the blueprint. I love how Woolf flits from character to character. How the dynamics between them are so crystal clear, messy, and affectionate all at the same. How the characters interactions with each other and their immediate surroundings says so much. A beautiful book.
I think I saw someone on the Fediverse recommend this book, but I forgot who. This is not your typical sci-fi manga. In fact, I forgot I was reading a manga at all, because the art had very Western sensibilities. The universe that Sakatsuki creates here is carefully put together. A lot of mystery is unveiled a bit at a time. The characters met on the way, all have a little spark in them that touches you. I really quite liked this, and I look forward to more.
I read this book for the Misery May challenge. Boy, was this miserable. But I couldn't tear my eyes from the page. There is a lot, a lot, of trauma in this book. When it was over, I felt a little empty. I wished that there was more to it. It felt that it ended too abruptly, with little resolution. But it's going down as a favourite.
2025-01-15
I started the semester yesterday. I'm freaking out. I have soooo much reading to do this semester. A lot of it is dense history texts. Some of it is poetry (a lot of Whitman, thankfully I'm partial to Whitman). I estimated how much time it would take me to do each week of the course depending on my reading and note taking speed. Let's just say it's nigh impossible. My focus this semester is efficiency. Frankly, I'm sweating just writing this blog post. It feels like a waste of time, but I need something to keep me anchored as the weeks go by. Some hobby to make it feel like life isn't all school and work.
I'm supposed to transition into both a new role and a new team. I got switched to a team whose tech stack is entirely React. I have dabbled with React before, but nothing substantial. So I will essentially have to learn React in a professional context. I'm nervous, but I'm excited. I've always wanted to modernize my tech stack (Java an be quite uninspiring), but never have the will to do so in my own time. You know what they say, use your job to get paid to learn new things.
I've been slowly cracking away at both Rebecca and Anna Karenina. I also decided to start reading The Secret History all over again?? I really love the book, I think it's my all time favourite. I just love injecting myself into this group of oddball students who are too obsessed with aesthetic.
Along the way I've been reading a smattering of manga.
Most listened to albums:
Help me I'm starting to listen to the same albums again and again. It's really hard to find albums on my phone, so I just end up listening to what I know I like. I do listen on Spotify desktop (cracked) in order to listen to new music, but that's about it.
2025-01-11
I like music stats. I have three accounts on different music tracking services: Last.fm, ListenBrainz, and Libre.fm. Last.fm is the one I use the most, and it's the one that I've had the longest. ListenBrainz is by the same people behind MusicBrainz, so their database is really comprehensive. However, there are (last time I checked), no social aspects, which is what I really like about Last.fm. Lastly, there is Libre.fm. It has always been extremely barebones. Very little in terms of features, but I like what they stand for, keeping things free in the FOSS sense. Of course, Spotify has their own stats that can be accessed through different services. However, I (used to) really like their year end summary. I'll be comparing the four of these (mainly just 3)!
There are a lot of images here, so I'll put the TL;DR here.
I really liked the cute, intimate feel that ListenBrainz has with their stats. A lot more creative and full of personality. Last.fm reigns above all in terms of the different stats they provide, and also providing me a psychological analysis that neither ListenBrainz or Spotify did. Spotify was a disappointment. AI generated genre names, uninspired images, and boring stats with little personalization. Overall, everyone except for Spotify was a winner.
Last.fm packs a lot of information into their summary image, which is much appreciated. A downside is that the font is quite small because of it (how else will they put all of that info in there). The design is a little sterile, but still pleasing to my eye. I'm happy that they didn't include my username, sometimes I sensitive about sharing my username places.
They don't allow customizing the colours for their images, but that's alright. I think it would be a lot of work, especially since they have little art mascots throughout their summary. Not a lot of information here: just some stats, genre percentages, and your two most played albums. Some of the text overlaps onto the most played album, and becomes unreadable if the album is as dark or darker than the text. My username is on here, which feels violating. Thankfully, it can be pretty easy to edit it out.
This summary made me realize just how much rock I listen to. I'm a rocker at heart.
Classic format. Sweet and short. I wasn't happy with their colour choices, unfortunately.
Despite being so feature bare, Libre.fm at the very least has some year end stats! Of course, it's nothing fancy. Just a literal webpage, nothing downloadable. I don't think this is a priority for the developers, which is more than fair. They have no other stats, this is it.
The numbers here are quite low because I only have Libre.fm hooked up to my YouTube scrobbler. However, close to the end of 2024, I ended up switching away from Spotify and am using other music clients instead. Some of them allow for Libre.fm scrobbling, which is really cool!
Last.fm was the only one who did this, not even Spotify, which was such a bummer. I like being categorized into boxes because it's fun. They use a radar or spider web chart to show how you rank in certain characteristics, which lead them to
I love this Joy Division inspired graphic. I'm not entirely sure how it works. I think each white line represents the average listening times per week. The line peaks and dips per hour depending on how much you tend to listen at that hour. It ends up looking like a series of mountain ranges. Very pretty and super smart. Apparently my favourite time to listen to music was 8am.
This graphic makes me laugh. Last.fm decided to layout the daily listens on a snake-like line, winding left to right. Each day is represented with a circle. The bigger the circle, the more listens. The pepto-bismal pink and the shape of the line reminds me of intestines. But I appreciate having this heatmap. I listened to all 366 days of the year (I forgot that 2024 was a leap year).
ListenBrainz has a more traditional grid heatmap. The darker the colour, the more listens. The green colour reminds me of GitHub's commit heatmap.
This was something that only Last.fm did. They showed me just exactly what rank I was for certain albums, tracks, and listeners. It's interesting but I didn't make it very high on any one thing.
The artist heatmap is quite straightforward. It's really hard to tell which countries had more listens. I think if it wasn't a blue monochromatic colour scheme, it would be clearer.
I much prefer this world map. I think most of it is due to the light scheme, whereas Last.fm had a dark theme. It's obvious where most of my listens lie: U.S., Japan, South Korea, England, and Australia.
Last.fm outs me as someone who is firmly in the 2020s when it comes to music. I'm glad that I managed to have at least some listening from each decade. It's really hard for me to listen to older music if it doesn't sound "timeless." Once it starts to feel a little dated, I can't take it seriously. This is mostly a complaint aimed at the 80s, hah.
The graphic is a little uninspired. A simple horizontal bar chart. The Y-axis is all the decades from 1960. From pre-1960 to 1980, there is a small section. The 1990s is a little bit more. The 2000s is about 20% of the way across the screen. The 2010s about 40%. And the 2020's, like 80%.
ListenBrainz is a little more incriminating. The X-axis is a time scale from 1945 to 2025. Each year gets its own bar. I listen to a sad smattering of things from 1953 to 2003. Things increase a little from 2004 to 2022. And there's a huuuge spike in 2023 and 2024. So yeah, listened to a lot of stuff in 2024.
This is only something available to pro Last.fm users, unfortunately. The mainstream score is not too accurate, anyhow. Really, it measures mainstream-ability among Last.fm users, which is not a big population to begin with. Still, it's an interesting stat to see!
I was more mainstream this year, which is a blow to my special snowflake ego, but oh well.
Strangely, there was no genre slide from Last.fm's official playback for the year. However, they still had the yearly stats on their Last.year page.
The main summary image is the only downloadable image they had for genre, however on their summary page, they had an interesting graphic for the summaries. I'm not quite sure what to call it, a tree map but not quite a tree map.
It seems to have split my listening into a few main groups:
Spotify's genre analysis this year was... Disappointing, to say the least. They identified three major genres for the year but they just had to use their weird AI genre titles. To make matters worse, it was just text against abstract backgrounds. Not even a genre hamburger. I wish they did a month by month breakdown. And, of course, Spotify basically stops tracking in October/November and they missed my big Emo/Screamo phase. I'm pretty salty over that.
Last.fm kind of scattered the stats through their playback. They provided a lot more numbers than expected. It was often just text on a plain coloured background as a lead up to the next stat. Nothing special but I like the numbers.
This is so cute! I love their little watercolour characters. Two green peppers (?) wearing headphones. And a tree stump just sitting there, chilling. I also like the inclusion of what year the music I listened to came from (I am too trendy for my own good).
I like this slide, especially since it compares me to global stats. A little boring but the numbers nerd in me smiles in delight.
What I liked the most was that Last.fm kept my preferred artist picture (on Last.fm, you can control what picture is displayed across the site for you for any artist). I am your typical black and white user. It went well with simple colour schemes they had.
They also included a fairly useless graph, unless you listen to really popular artists. Seems that maybe there is an average of IDLES 100 scrobbles per user, and I was very above average.
I really hated the Spotify backgrounds this year. But I think I've always hated them. At least they managed to include the bare minimum stats.
Last.fm included a little bubble collage of my top ten artists. It's a little small, but what can you do. It would be cool if it filled the entire page with more artists, and somehow highlighted the top ten instead. It's also difficult to tell the from the smaller sizes, who ranks where.
I love the art on ListenBrainz's images. This one includes okra? And a piece of lettuce? I wish I knew. I don't really eat vegetables. Unlike Last.fm, this is an actual list with no artist images. However, it's easier to see the artist rankings.
Top artists:
Spotify only includes 5 top artists, but also shows both the ranking and artist images. I think I like this format the most, but would like to include the top 10, not just the top 5.
My top artists:
It kind annoys me that the entire album doesn't fit in the screen. But at least it shows it?
Of course, it also includes the weird graph that doesn't really show any useful (imo) information! Global average is around 100 scrobbles.
Last.fm provides a carousel of the albums that you can swipe through. Sadly, it wasn't information display all on one page. Thankfully, they included the top 25 (!) albums.
I'll save you from all 25 albums but here are the first and last.
This is really cute! This is a 3x3 collage that is framed by the vegertable themed characters. Super cute idea. Lots of personality.
No surprise here. Takes the same format as both the top artist and the top album.
This yellow is awful. That is all.
I'm surprised they only included 5 tracks. It takes the form of a horizontal bar chart, and the saturation fades as you go down the list.
A simple list, no album covers. Some of the same pepper and lettuce characters (literally copied and pasted from previous images).
Top Songs
More awful yellow.
My top songs